Talk:Kepler-20

Main sequence
The article said, "As of 2011, it has not yet been determined whether this is a main-sequence star"

Given its radius, mass, and spectral type, there's really nothing else that it can be besides a main-sequence star. I don't think it would be presumptious to list Kepler-20 as G8V. 71.29.12.46 (talk) 20:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't know what else it could be either and that claim is currently uncited. I've tagged it with a citation-needed tag to see if anything turns up. --JorisvS (talk) 22:40, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Sixth planet?
Looks like somebody's going to need to work the results of http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.06836 into the article... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kepler-20. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120119135819/http://exoplanet.eu/star.php?st=Kepler-20 to http://exoplanet.eu/star.php?st=Kepler-20
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6630AbtJZ?url=http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/photometry_colour.html to http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/photometry_colour.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)