Talk:Kepler-40b/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:43, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Well written and accords sufficiently with MoS.
 * I think that the phrase KOI-428b is a Hot Jupiter discovered in the orbit of the star KOI-428, would be better as KOI-428b is a Hot Jupiter planet discovered in the orbit of the star KOI-428,''
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References appear to check out, I note that the PDF ref #1 is extremely slow to download, it might be good to mention this.


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * no images used.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * no images used.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: