Talk:Kepler-4b/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Nergaal (talk) 04:38, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

I'll try to do this one too:
 * The planet's discovery was announced on January 4, 2010 in Washington, D.C. alongside the other four planets that the Kepler spacecraft had confirmed by that point after being confirmed by telescopes at the W.M. Keck Observatory. - hmmm
 * ✅ by User:Nstock --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * star, Kepler-4. Kepler-4  - repetition
 * ✅ --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * should "Kepler Mission" be capitalized?
 * ✅ I believe so, but to compromise I just changed the link to "Kepler spacecraft." --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * wikilink NASA


 * Kepler-4 was, in turn, named for the Kepler Mission, a NASA satellite whose purpose is to discover Earth-like planets in a section of the sky between constellations Cygnus and Lyra using the transit method, where small and steady decreases in a star's brightness are measured as a planet crosses in front of it' - break apart
 * ✅ --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * 1.223 and 1.487 . needs respectively at the end
 * ✅ --Starstriker7(Talk) 15:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * why are none of the refs to reviewed journal articles?
 * Comment Reference 6 is an article that has been submitted to ApJ, and references 7 and 8 are article that have been published in ApJ. The arxiv links are used because they are free to access by the public, whereas subscriptions are necessary to view them through the ApJ website. Nstock (talk) 18:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * If that is the case, then the journal name, issue and year (with doi) need to be added. I'll pass it after that. Nergaal (talk) 05:47, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Nstock (talk) 21:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * the infobox needs refs
 * ✅ by User:Starstriker7 --Nstock (talk) 18:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Nergaal (talk) 04:38, 11 March 2011 (UTC)