Talk:Kepler-5b/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tarret  ''talk 18:14, 19 May 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Due to having similar structures and being relate topics the articles Kepler-5b, Kepler-6b, and Kepler-7b were reviewed simlutaneously. Also, the current GA-class article Kepler-4b, was used as a "model" article for this review process.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Very well written articles. Where possible try to use the same section headings across each article where the content is of a similar nature for example one article calls a section "Host Star" and another "Parent Star". Also, if possible merge all of the "Kepler-x System" templates into one "Kepler Mission" template and remove the "See Also" at the end of the articles which contain them.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * In general very good articles, keep up the good work and if possible feel free to visit WP:GAN and review an article.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * In general very good articles, keep up the good work and if possible feel free to visit WP:GAN and review an article.
 * In general very good articles, keep up the good work and if possible feel free to visit WP:GAN and review an article.