Talk:Kepler-9

Stellar data
The fact box gives key information that contradicts the discovery paper by Holman and colleagues. Holman et al. provide few details on the star, but they do say that its mass is 1.0 Solar masses and its radius is 1.1 Solar radii. If the mass and radius in the fact box were accurate, then the masses and orbits of the planets would be quite different.

I wonder if the person who inserted the current data mistook Kepler-9 for another star in the Kepler field.Thuvan Dihn (talk) 18:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The paper from Torres et al. that appeared on the arXiv today gives 1.07 M⊙ and 1.02R⊙ using the same spectroscopic parameters as Holman et al. ( T eff, log g, [Fe/H] )  - unfortunately I don't have access to the Holman et al. paper as it is behind the Science paywall. Icalanise (talk) 18:53, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

KOI-377.03
Is KOI-377.03 below the detection capabilities of HIRES or HARPS ? i believe they have similar precision (0.97 m/s) ; and is this happening on HD 10180 b also?. Does anybody know? Quantanew (talk) 20:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kepler-9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110103072601/http://exoplanet.eu/star.php?st=Kepler-9 to http://exoplanet.eu/star.php?st=Kepler-9
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100901135134/http://www.planetary.org/news/2010/0827_From_the_Ground_and_from_Space_New.html to http://www.planetary.org/news/2010/0827_From_the_Ground_and_from_Space_New.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kepler-9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100831011606/http://www.astronomynow.com/news/n1008/26kepler/ to http://astronomynow.com/news/n1008/26kepler/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)