Talk:Kepler-9/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: the link to KOI-377.03 redirects back to this article so, you should de-link KOI-377.03. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot:

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Complies sufficiently, I made one minor copy-edit
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Ref #1 failed verification. The information may be elsewhere on this site.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * As broad as is reasonable given this is a recent discovery.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Suitable rationale and caption
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just one reference needs fixing. On Hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I have resolved all the pointers you've brought up. --Starstriker7(Talk) 05:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Well done, I just couldn't find that on the site, but imagined that it would be there.  I am now happy to list this as a good article. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. :D --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Well done, I just couldn't find that on the site, but imagined that it would be there.  I am now happy to list this as a good article. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. :D --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)