Talk:Kerchoonz

Infobox
does anyone know how to make the image smaller in the infobox?Cheaperbydozen (talk) 22:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * shrunk using |200px, you can change the number to change the size. However you also have a non free logo file that should have had it size reduced to start with. ps I have restored User:Cheaperbydozen/K-box for you to work on and make it look less like an advertisement.


 * For this sandbox article you rely too heavily on one interview in the introduction, there should be more description of the topic and less quoting. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:49, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

ok, thank youCheaperbydozen (talk) 09:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

You can decide if it is Kching or K-ching and just use one term. Also it would be good to find more reliable references that talk about it, more magazines. Is there any information in the annual report of the company - is it a big product or not? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

move
i have moved the article to kerchoonz.com after a few of the editors checked the page and said that the article now looks ok. Because the kerchoonz name was blocked it has been moved to kerchoonz.com. I guess either name would be ok? But, I think that the site goes by kerchoonz.

However, when I moved it, some of the references got messed up. The two references to musicweek are reporting errors on the page now that were not there before. I don't see why though. Cheaperbydozen (talk) 22:09, 1 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The problem was that the reference names can only be one word - if you use more than one word you have to enclose it in quotes. Eg.  <ref name="music week"...  rather than  <ref name=music week... .
 * Also, you only need to place the full reference once, after that you can just use  .  Now fixed.  AJCham  2097  (talk) 22:22, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

ok. cool. that explains it. thanksCheaperbydozen (talk) 22:52, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Update 2017
Their website seems no longer to be active. Did the company fold? What was their remaining impact (if any)? Does the article still meet relevancy guidelines? /Urbourbo (talk) 09:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)