Talk:Kerr Neilson

Untitled
This is an article about one of Australia's most successful businessmen who is one of Australia's richest men and appears in the media on a frequent basis.Rattlesnake6646 05:07, 20 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Fair enough, but you needed to include this information early on to avoid the non-notable tag. All I saw was a "fund manager" I'd never heard of, and I can think of a few who aren't notable right in my own town.  If he's exceptionally wealthy and gets loads of media exposure (even if concentrated mainly in one country), then his notability is unquestionable, but when I placed the tag neither fact was present in this article. -- Dethme0w 06:53, 20 September 2007 (UTC)


 * needs independent references Jimfbleak 05:34, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kerr Neilson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719094605/http://www.goodreturns.co.nz/article/976487727/portfolio-talk-kerr-neilson.html to https://www.goodreturns.co.nz/article/976487727/portfolio-talk-kerr-neilson.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121110092252/http://www.brw.com.au/Page/Uuid/8ab8af52-7ea0-11e0-9add-765096dd6fc5 to http://www.brw.com.au/Page/Uuid/8ab8af52-7ea0-11e0-9add-765096dd6fc5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Interesting edit | November 2020
Lucyscroope has made a significant edit that, in part, should not be placed in the lead and, in other parts, relates to Neilson's former wife and are not relevant in this article, at all. The use of Kerr and Judith throughout the article implies that the editor may know them personally, including a reference to South Africa (described as 'here' (sic.)), and not taking a neutral point of view. Having said all that, it would appear that the editor is relatively new to Wikipedia and acted in good faith. However, a major reconstruction of the article has commenced to restore some objectivity. Finally, in no way, in its current form, is this article a stub. Rangasyd (talk) 10:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)