Talk:Kevin Gage (actor)

STOP removing Verifiable, legally correct information from this Actor's update.
Additional info that is being removed - [redacted]

[ Redacted - No legal threats, per This policy  ]
 * Wikiblogg - to put this information on Wikipedia you simply must point to some reliable secondary source. A newspaper interview? Kevin Gage's own website? Otherwise, there would be nothing to stop me claiming to know (or even be) David Cameron and filling the article with details of his activities in Taxi's with tarts. And please don't start throwing around legal threats. (a) you'll get blocked, which won't help anyone, and (b) your lawyer will laugh. A lot.  --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Son with Kelly Preston
Why is there no mention of his son with Kelly Preston? 2601:8:9180:604:219:D1FF:FEA8:25F0 (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Such personal information added to biography articles must be supported by reliable sources. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kevin Gage (actor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141011202041/http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=ebb81067f8e67730b1f3439b7bee8e5b to http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=ebb81067f8e67730b1f3439b7bee8e5b
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081020213959/http://safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=674 to http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=674

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

name policy, non notable offspring
Consider whether the inclusion of names of living private individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value.

The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved, otherwise low-profile persons. The names of any immediate, former, or significant family members or any significant relationship of the subject of a BLP may be part of an article, if reliably sourced, subject to editorial discretion that such information is relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject.[f] However, names of family members who are not also notable public figures must be removed from an article if they are not properly sourced. Saintstephen000 (talk)