Talk:Kevin Horton

Unreliable sources
The sources removed in this edit are, in order: I also removed a link to an apparently-abandoned "official website" that may be his but has been dead for more than a decade, and a YouTube channel that was not confirmed to be his. None of the above was reliable third-party coverage of Horton, and the arguably marginally better sources were misrepresented. I'll thus revert again. Huon (talk) 08:37, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) A wiki. Not subject to meaningful editorial oversight, not a reliable source. Also not an independent source.
 * 2) A forum post. User-submitted content without editorial oversight, not reliable.
 * 3) The subject's own website (if it indeed is his). While that might be reliable enough for trivia such as his nickname, there's no indication that the nickname is significant in the first place - the website talks only of the game, not the nickname.
 * 4) An interview that doesn't actually confirm the statement it's cited for.