Talk:Kevin Martin (curler)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:02, 31 January 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Before I start reviewing, please cite every paragraph in the career section.
 * The lead is a little bit short. Has he set any records? Was he included in a "Curling Hall of Fame"?
 * This article has a strong potential to be promoted, and I am happy to see the first GA about a curler, but it needs some work in referencing, so I am putting this on hold before I resume.
 * Are the additions made adequate? Thanks! Prayerfortheworld (talk) 04:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The prose is very good
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All references should contain the publisher and the accessdate
 * References are otherwise reliable
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Very nice article! -- GoP T C N 11:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Very nice article! -- GoP T C N 11:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail: