Talk:Kevin Padian

DI's Wells claims
What Padian & Gishlick wrote was the following (full paragraph):

Given that Wells was only awarded his doctorate in 1994, it is not unreasonable to assume that the two papers Larabell is talking about were the two Padian & Gishlick explicitly mentioned. Certainly to make the accusation of "misrepresentation" stick, it needs to be proved that these were not the same papers. HrafnTalkStalk 09:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This could be. I have to do some mroe research (of the dispute and wikipedia policy).  Table Manners C·U·T 05:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kevin Padian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930181232/http://www2.ncseweb.org/kvd/experts/padian.pdf to http://www2.ncseweb.org/kvd/experts/padian.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080112153455/http://www.aaas.org/aboutaaas/fellows/new_fellows.shtml to http://www.aaas.org/aboutaaas/fellows/new_fellows.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)