Talk:Keyflower (board game)

peer review
The article has a clear and cohesive structure. It's organized into small sections that make it easy to read and navigate. Having said that, I think it would be helpful to have a little bit more high-level information in the lead section, as I felt like I didn't fully understand what the game was about until I got to the gameplay section.

If possible, I'd try to add some citations into the gameplay section. I'm also writing about a game, and although it's difficult to find reputable sources, I've been trying to reference the official game site where applicable. Additionally, perhaps consider linking to related articles on Wikipedia. It would make it easier to learn about related entities, such as R&D Games. Perhaps consider adding a "Reception" section too if relevant. I was a little bit confused on the "Promo Tiles" section, so maybe you could add a small description explaining that section to people unfamiliar with the game

Otherwise, I think this has the makings of a strong article and fills a gap on Wikipedia. Nice work!

Pwatrous (talk) 18:04, 17 October 2019 (UTC)