Talk:Keynsham/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Aha! Another place my ancestors came from (though it was recorded as Gloucestershire...) - anyway.... Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)


 * It is home to memorial park, - "a memorial park''? or "It is home to Memorial Park,"
 * Capitalised as proper name


 * Be nice to expand the first para of History a little - you mention scattered Roman remains and then all you serve up is a couple of lousy coffins :)
 * Added a bit re mosaic etc


 * Again, any political colour that can be added to the governance section all the better. reads a little generic as is.
 * Added town & district council wards + parties & MP


 * ...six left-bank fields... link or explain
 * Reworded


 * I don't get much of a feel for Memorial Park - is it mainly woodland or mainly open-space fields? Any other features to it?
 * Expanded this quite a bit


 * Culture section could be buffed some more. How long's the festival been going?
 * Added a bit - festival only since late 1990s


 * Noteworthy residents section should be converted into prose - surely there is some Bill Bailey material which can make a good intro?
 * Done - there are a couple of Bailey comments about Keynsham on Couchtripper but nothing I thought was right to use.

Anyway, seems a little sterile compared with some of the other Somerset towns, but not a huge amount to do. Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your edits and comments - hopefully addressed above.&mdash; Rod talk 21:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: I ummed and aahed about this, as I feels it does lack a little something, but I don't recall seeing much else written about the town anywhere, so am happy that it is a good board coverage of available sourcing. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)