Talk:Khaboris Codex


 * Quote from the "Introduction to the Khabouris Codex Transcription": "Carbon dating has found this copy of the New Testament to be approximately 1,000 years old." Why then in the main article writes "It has been carbon-dated to the first decade of the 4th century"? also the introduction beggin with "The Khaburis Manuscript is a copy of a second century New Testament, which was written in approximately 165 AD (internally documented as 100 years after the great persecution of the Christians by Nero, in 65AD)." See: http://www.dukhrana.com/khabouris/files/001%20Introduction.doc --FlorinCB (talk) 07:10, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Its supposedly old date and colophon reading (in truth the colophon is illegible and no transcription has ever been published) are simply persistent fibs that have circulated around the internet. I have removed them from the article. אמר Steve Caruso 21:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Khaboris Codex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140821175545/http://www.peshitta.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1533 to http://www.peshitta.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1533
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120105152610/http://www.reporter.am/pdfs/B0112-W.pdf to http://www.reporter.am/pdfs/B0112-W.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)