Talk:Khatchig Mouradian

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Khatchig Mouradian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/16454
 * Added tag to http://www.zmag.org/zspace/khatchigmouradian
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513163414/http://www.jewcy.com/user/1836/khatchig_mouradian to http://www.jewcy.com/user/1836/khatchig_mouradian
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thejewishadvocate.com/this_weeks_issue/opinions/?content_id=3731
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thejewishadvocate.com/this_weeks_issue/opinions/?content_id=4201
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090522112429/http://www.nepoetryclub.org/contests2008.htm to http://www.nepoetryclub.org/contests2008.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:13, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

CE run and flags for issues
This is a BLP. There are some issues with the article that need to be addressed.
 * 1) Many of the sources cited for claims are written by the subject, and I challenge the use of subject written material when used as the sole support of claims in an article.
 * 2) There are  numerous claims which are cited to links that do not support the claim. Sometimes this is because the link is to a general site such as a school. Sometimes the claim is taken out of context from the source. Sometimes, the claim just doesn't appear in the source.
 * 3) There are various external links throughout the article to sites such as Blogspot. I challenge the use of such external links and don't think they are justified in being there.

Issues #2 and #3 are intertwined in that often, the source provided is given via external link, instead of a full citation. I have fixed some of these issues, where I could verify that source as reliable and the claim as present. Where I couldn't do that, I left the external link in place instead of fixing it. Curdigirl (talk) 09:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * It's been almost three years since the BLP notability tag was added, in addition to the host of the issues cited here. Unless there are any objections, I suggest we move ahead with nominating the article for deletion. Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 16:49, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The subject just published a book, which is likely to get reviews in the near future, and there is plenty of news coverage of his work (t &#183; c)  buidhe  00:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Publication of a book, while significant, is still insufficient to meet the standards of notability. Most of the publications cited in the link still seem fairly regional and parochial. One can, of course, return to this article if the subject later attains a more national or global profile, but right now this unaffiliated junior scholar is not there (certainly not at the level of a Benedict Anderson or Tom Holland). Right now, much of this entry reads like an act of self-promotion. Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 14:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Request Deletion/Unlink from Armenian Weekly
Although I do understand that Mourdian is the former editor of the Armenian Weekly, his profile page should not redirect to the paper. Either unlink, or delete the profile page.

--Շահէն (talk) 21:24, 5 May 2021 (UTC)