Talk:Kibeho

Our Lady of Kibeho
This article is in need of expansion, and in particular more information on the Marian apparition of Our Lady of Kibeho. Right now, the Our Lady of Kibeho page redirects here, but if enough information can be obtained, we may want to create an article at the Our Lady of Kibeho namespace focusing specifically on the apparition while this article focuses more on the geographical locale of Kibeho. Dgf32 (talk) 00:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Agreed. For this reason, I've added considerably to the linked Kibeho Massacre page, and edited the section of this page that dealt with it. But this page still needs historical, geographic and religious additions, which I'm not able to contribute to--Nickm57 (talk) 07:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I also agree. But, and sadly but, all info about Kibeho is subject to controversy since there are claims that the Archbishop who approved it was in on the original attrocities, etc. So there is need for very careful analysis before info is just added from web references, etc. I do think it needs serious expanion, but please note that it is different because of the sad facts of war, complicity, genocide and then suddenly decoration by fancy proclamation. History2007 (talk) 15:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Reverting the additions of 6 July
I've reverted most of Kejon69's contributions of July 6. No offence intended, but Wikipedia obliges editors to provide some sources for such claims - which, if they exist, would be better suited to the linked page on the Kibeho Massacre anyway. An invitation to "speak with any of the aid workers present" is not adequate for Wikipedia. --Nickm57 (talk) 06:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kibeho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002084901/http://www.kibeho.net/store/ to http://www.kibeho.net/store
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070908165009/http://sunday.ninemsn.com.au/sunday/cover_stories/article_1869.asp?s=1 to http://sunday.ninemsn.com.au/sunday/cover_stories/article_1869.asp?s=1
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725013959/http://www.zenit.org//english/ to http://www.zenit.org/english/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081011143252/http://www.anzacday.org.au/history/peacekeeping/anecdotes/kibeho.html to http://www.anzacday.org.au/history/peacekeeping/anecdotes/kibeho.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:34, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://discover.rw/kibeho-a-global-pilgrimage-destination/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 08:57, 19 December 2022 (UTC)