Talk:Kidnap (2017 film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 01:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Some Dude From North Carolina, I will take up the review for this nomination and present it to you in some time. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 01:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I've completed the review. The article more or less meets the good article criteria but there are a couple minor issues which need to be resolved before I can promote it, primarily the first one listed in the comments. Good work on the article in general! Tayi Arajakate  Talk 19:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The issues are resolved now so I'll promote the article. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 07:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments

 * The last four producers and the editor mentioned in the infobox are not mentioned in those roles (or not mentioned at all) in the body nor are they cited in the infobox. Di Bonaventura Pictures is abbreviated as "di B Pictures" in the infobox, the shouldn't it be "dB Pictures"?
 * Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ 1. Added Panic Room format. 2. The company is credited as "di B Pictures" in the poster. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)


 * "... with Halle Berry attached to star ..." The use of "attached to" in the phrase sounds odd, I would suggest using "featured as" instead. I would also suggest adding a comma before the "with".
 * ✅ Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)


 * "... while still owing the feature itself $15 million ..." This phrase isn't very clear. I would suggest adding a "worth" after itself.
 * ✅ Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Assessment
 Comprehension: The comprehension is good.

Verifiability: The article is verifiable.

Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.

Neutrality: The article is neutral.

Stability: The article is stable. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.

