Talk:Killing Ground (film)

Reception
Why is this section filled with virtually irrelevant stuff like 3AW and /Film when there's a perfectly good NEW YORK TIMES review linked at the bottom, which gives its verdict on this film thus: '...this movie has the hallmarks of torture porn: gratuitous slaughter, remorseless murderers and gruesome acts'; '...these personality-free characters fade from your mind even as you’re watching the screen, making the brutality waged against them akin to animated mutilation of cartoon creatures. Certainly, the senselessness of bloodshed may be Mr. Power’s point. But with this setup, such a message is all but muted.' Seems a little odd in focus and omission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.200.222 (talk) 23:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Natural horror?
Why is this film included in the "Australian natural horror films" category? It doesn't fit the description of that category at all: "The genre features natural forces, typically in the form of animals or plants, that pose a threat to human characters." 2001:9E8:263:5500:59DA:27C9:AA6F:53CD (talk) 00:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC)