Talk:Kilvidi Seshachari/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 19:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

The image is appropriately licensed.
 * What makes the following reliable sources?
 * madrasmusings.com -- it looks like it's a newspaper but I can't find any evidence of editorial oversight or staff
 * This is a local newspaper specifically in Madras (now Chennai). Seems to be registered as a newspaper. Does not have a very good online presence, admittedly. We seem to have an article on Madras Musings that has additional details. Overall, my take is that it is not as famous as The Hindu or The Indian Express, but, specifically for matters of local importance (in this case city history) we should be good to use the source.


 * cricHQ.com
 * CricHQ is a cricket database and sports management website that can be used to reference past scorecards. We do seem to have an article on CricHQ.


 * "Seshachari was a member of the first All-Indian cricket team to tour England in 1911" is followed two sentences later by "making it the first all-Indian team to tour the British Isles". We don't need both; I suggest making the first reference "Seshachari was a member of the Indian cricket team that toured England in 1911", since the later reference provides a little extra detail.

That's everything; the article is in good shape. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:50, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for this review . Acknowledging the notes from above. I am buried with work related deadlines. Will try to sneak some time to read in-detail and address the comments. Much appreciate some time. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 15:55, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * No problem; I'll check in in a week to see if you've had time, but I'm happy to keep the review open for a while if you're planning to work on it. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:36, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for your patience . I think I have addressed your requests. But, if there is something else I can do, please do not hesitate to let know. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 22:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * OK on the sources and the change looks good; passing. I know you said you're busy but your nominations are now near the top of the queue so I'll probably pick another one up shortly; no worries if you need to take a little time to work on them, if work is necessary. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 22:18, 26 August 2022 (UTC)