Talk:Kim Chong Kwang

Comments about the draft review
Copied from Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Korea. "Draft:Kim Chong Kwang was declined by User:MurielMary for not meeting "Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations" despite having 21 footnotes (granted, badly formatted). So the decline reason is totally bogus and like most examples illustrated above shows that the draft review system is a failure, with articles being reviewed by people not familiar with basic policies and declining them with faulty rationales. The subject has a corresponding article on Korean Wikipedia and some news coverage, although I wasn't able to locate academic coverage outside few mentions in passing. The subject won some awards, although not all are cited, and it is unclear if they are significant. This should have been accepted, perhaps tagged with notability. Sigh." --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)