Talk:Kimball Island/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Eviolite (talk · contribs) 19:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

As promised, I'll look at this soon.. ev iolite  (talk)  19:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Quick update still quite busy IRL, will try to start in the next few days but it might take some more time. Sorry about that.  ev iolite   (talk)  00:42, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Fine by me -- no rush :) jp×g 00:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Sorry for the massive delay – real life caught up to me – but I looked over the article, am satisfied with the resolutions to previous comments, did some spotchecks which were fine, and did a few minor copyedits. I am happy with promoting it to GA now; nice work! ev iolite  (talk)  00:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)