Talk:Kimberly Dudik

April 2020 edits
I removed the edits because they were highly suspect and looked like they were done by someone from Dudik's campaign or possibly Dudik herself. One edit put Dudik's campaign website like in opening paragraph! Not acceptable. - CharlesShirley (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Recent edits by Rankin406
Really trying not to engage in the WP:3RR, so I'd like to draw attention to the recent edits by Rankin406. They added resume-like content in list form, which I removed per WP:NOT. They readded, and I removed. Looks like they readded the content for a third time, which I will not remove. So trying to draw attention here to the issues. There are too many external links that are completely unnecessary, and the sponsored legislation section has a lot of issues with primary sources (though some sources actually mention Dudik and probably should remain). Going to ping for some input here too. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 14:27, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , Completely agree with you. I have restored a clean version of the article and left a COI notice on Rankin406's talk page. Based on their contributions, I think this would be an open-and-shut case at WP:COIN. I suggest you take it there if they make one more revert. KidAd  •  SPEAK  18:28, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , awesome, thanks for the assistance. There are some decent additions they added, so when I have more time I will parse through them and extract what I can. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 21:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)