Talk:Kimberly Hunt

Notability
According to: Notability (people): "A person is notable if he or she has been the subject of secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject"
 * I would like to check the references that were recently added, but they are not in the correct format; the references list the web site publisher and title, but there is no URL, author, or date published, so I can not locate the article. Please include this information, so people can verify the sources; for help on citing sources see Citing sources. —User:Christopher Mann McKay 17:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

COI Template
Hello Barkeep,

I'm writing you in the hopes you might remove the COI template for: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimberly_Hunt It was placed there by you in March, and no one visiting the page since has taken issue with the way I have contributed to it. I have taken an interest in the subject's career and achievements, and keep her page updated. You helped me several years ago, to clean up the article, and I have continued to contribute in a neutral fashion, as well as sourcing all new information. Please consider removing the disclaimer. Sincerely Kusinews (talk) 07:57, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I have taken issue with it. Because no one has acted upon this conflict of interest or commented on it does not make the issue go away. The article, in my view, lacks an independent editor who is both knowledgeable of the article subject and willing to review the article and/or make any necessary changes, additions, or subtractions. Outside of yourself and some anon San Diego IP addresses, no other user has made any significant contributions to the article, particularly a registered user (see here) and that is why a conflict of interest exists, no matter the intentions thus far. Its just the current state of the article and who it was prepared by. If you would like to actively seek out someone who may review the article or provide guidance I would try the Wikipedia Conflict of interest Noticeboard or Editor assistance/Requests. Until then, I wold like to see an independent reviewer, with no connection to the subject, edit or comment on the article before the template is removed. If there is any thing else I can help with, please let me know.  Barkeep  Chat/''' 13:29, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * As a San Diegan and long time registered editor I will offer there appears to be nothing unusual or biased about this article. Though it may appear to read like a glowing press release on this journalist, I'm pretty certain that's the only way it could ever appear- Ms. Hunt is a respected television personality in this area with absolutely no negative feelings toward her or reason to introduce controversy in any discussion of her. It could be said if there were such controversy it would be far more likely you'd have a more diverse set of editors contributing as they carp over the tone of the article and push and pull for its content.
 * We at wikipedia have long maintained this absurd facade that article editors are always objective and can have no connections or bias toward issues behind the articles we edit. While NPOV is the most noble of pursuits and we should always be mindful of this, we also know we wouldn't be reading much less editing an article in the first place unless we had a personal interest in the subject.
 * I will further note that Ms. Hunt's employment by KUSI news ended years ago, so a professional connection is doubtful- but wouldn't it be refreshing if all such connections were as open and honest as this editor whose pseudonym is so candid?
 * Unless it can be demonstrated the article is promoting this person professionally and not simply offering a biography based on the verifiable facts, I move to remove the template and unless objections are raised will do so in about a week.Batvette (talk) 22:23, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * As the editor who placed the COI template I'm fine that you remove it. My only request was that someone who did not have a connection with the article subject but also had knowledge of her review the article. My main concern was that this was simply a resume of the article subject and there were areas about her that weren't being told. I'll assume good faith and take the content in the article as a fair representation of her, particularly with your comments above and your review. Thanks!  Barkeep  Chat/''' 14:22, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kimberly Hunt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723192929/http://www.sdpressclub.org/uploads/2010_Awards_Final_Winners_Announced.pdf to http://www.sdpressclub.org/uploads/2010_Awards_Final_Winners_Announced.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100531175345/http://www.wivesbehindthebadge.org/shopwithacop1.html to http://www.wivesbehindthebadge.org/shopwithacop1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Top lip over filled
What happen to Ms Hunt top lip on the left side? 2604:CA00:1CA:2C15:0:0:A61:CF5C (talk) 19:06, 12 April 2022 (UTC)