Talk:Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC

Bad article
This is a very badly written article, clearly written by somebody who does not know much about patents or misuse. It totally misses the point of the case, and emphasizes an irrelevant quotation. This could be somebody's idea of a joke on Wikipedia. At the very least it makes WP look unprofessional, or not to put too fine a point on it, amateurish.

No mention of stare decisis. No mention of Court's explanation that misuse is not antitrust. No mention of the Court's explanation oif why it considers Brulotte correct.

And what is that silly red chart in the External Links doing in an article about a Supreme Court case?

Whoever wrote this also did not bother to use the search box to notice that there is at least one other more substantive write-up of this case in another WP article. Patent_misuse

Would somebody who knows something about the subject matter totally rewrite this, please? ? ? ? ? User:PraeceptorIP (talk) 21:49, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Now rewritten, mooting above comments. PraeceptorIP (talk) 22:37, 21 November 2016 (UTC)