Talk:Kimbundu languages

superfluous article
There exists an article "Kimbundu" which is rather more detailed and sourced than the article "Kimbundu Languages" that in fact is nothing but a stub dealing with one aspect of the "Kimbundu" article. My proposal is to integrate the article "Kimbundu languages" into the article "Kimbundu", as a (very minor) contribution. --Aflis (talk) 17:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * That would be inappropriate without merging the various Kimbundu-language articles. Which may be appropriate, I don't know, but would contradict our sources.  — kwami (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2014 (UTC)