Talk:Kinderen voor Kinderen

Re paragraph suggesting racial bias
I much appreciate J73's extensive contribution of new material but have nonetheless pulled the following one paragraph, pending improvement. It needs fewer subjective judgements and more specifics and verifiable references. Where/when/in what mainstream medium did Ronald Snijders say the words attributed to him? Ditto for "one reviewer" (who, exactly?). Who says that Snijders represents "the stronger voices in the actual communities"? "A few coloured faces were spotted": who did this counting and spotting when? Also, it is overlinked. To me it seems unnecessary to link to "criticism", "first hand", "communities", or "antidote"; to link to "Surinam" twice; and to link to "choir" again. On the other hand, why not link "flautist"? And there must be a better term than "white-faced" (which links to a disambiguation page listing various animal species). "NB; that's not the only hint of criticism pointed at the choir; although a few coloured faces were spotted since the early days, and album 5 featured songs about first hand racism and colonialism, the stronger voices in the actual communities were not impressed. Surinam-born flautist Ronald Snijders was quoted 'If they ask me I'll write them a Surinam-flavoured song'. Instead he released his own album of children's songs with one reviewer branding it an antidote for 'the white-faced Kinderen voor Kinderen'." --IslandGyrl 02:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:KvK logo 2.png
Image:KvK logo 2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * This supplementary logo is not essential and strictly speaking is indeed probably not covered by fair use, as the main logo Image:KvK logo.png suffices to identify the subject. As the original uploader I therefore concur with the deletion of this second logo image. -- IslandGyrl 09:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kinderen voor Kinderen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216110158/http://www.popinstituut.nl/biografie/kinderen_voor_kinderen.482.html to http://www.popinstituut.nl/biografie/kinderen_voor_kinderen.482.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Complete lack of references
This article contains a bunch of outdated and contentious information that should really be referenced, and yet this article contains literally only two refs. According to WP:BLP we must remove poorly sourced material on sight, which would pretty much mean deleting almost the entire article. I thought I'd consult other Wikipedians before taking such a drastic measure. &horbar;JochemvanHees (talk) 09:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)