Talk:King Arthur's Great Halls

Current use of King Arthur's Hall
King Arthur's Hall is currently in use by the The Fellowship of the Knights of the Round Table of King Arthur as per the web page of the organization. I will update the wiki entry to reflect this. Cassius235 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:10, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Masons
I really can't see why the masons using the centre, or the nearest preceptory centre being in Launceston is in any way notable or relevant. Snowded TALK 04:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)


 * To add to that point - who else uses the hall? Is who uses it notable in any way?  The article passes that test for its origins.   Why is its use by the Masons special in any way?  Is it linked to the history of the building?  Snowded  TALK 11:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)


 * You appear to be getting confused. The building is currently owned by King Arthur Lodge of Freemasons and has been used as a Masonic hall since 1951, in a partnership with the local tourist association, they have developed part of the building as a tourist attraction.  The point I was making about the Knights Templar's is relevant, as there are scenes on the walls in the inner chamber of the hall depicting scenes of Knight Templar's in battle.  Thus the building, and especially the Great Hall, was build for such a body to use, hence it it strange that the nearest Preceptory of Knight Templars is based not in Tintagel, but in Launceston.    To answer your question as to who else uses the building, simple, nobody as the building is mainly a masonic hall Yummy Dunn (talk) 13:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I strill dont think its relevant, but its a "mostly, harmful harmless" addition. So despite your edit warring I will leave it, but I have deleted the final sentence.  That needs a third party source to establish that its notable, not a web site which announces its is a work in progress.  Read WP:RS  Snowded  TALK 23:28, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, it's not harmful, per se, but it is editorializing, which we don't allow either. I would also point out that that the association with Royal Arch and installations is irrelevant to a general reader, for whom "Masonic" is instantly more recognizable. MSJapan (talk) 02:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Typo there (corrected), reference to Hitchhikers Guide. If its an article about a building, then the origins of the building are of interest - like the origins of place names etc.   Its less clear that current use is notable, regardless of if a name is recognisable.  -- Snowded  TALK 03:56, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King Arthur's Hall, Tintagel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20120527080917/http://www.tintagelweb.co.uk/King%20Arthurs%20Great%20Halls2.htm to http://www.tintagelweb.co.uk/King%20Arthurs%20Great%20Halls2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:35, 10 December 2017 (UTC)