Talk:King Edward VII Academy

Comment
The school does not offer much. The school holds a lot of information back, with many unprofessional staff managing to produce some successful students (due to the catchment area producing many already bright kids) which they use as stats for their rep. The kids who don't do so well tend to be ignored by staff and are assumed as lost causes. The heads of some past year groups tend to be rude, stereotypical and over-powered. The head seems to be absent from staff/students problems- infact many may ask what his role is.. other than to promote a false reputation. (Magicstarfish89 (talk) 04:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC))

Reorganisation March 2009
I've tried to make a start building a better lead and sticking more with WP:WPSCH/AG. Needs third party references really and a history section certainly seems appropriate -- Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King Edward VII Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150214094344/http://www.kesacademy.co.uk/page/?title=History&pid=17 to http://www.kesacademy.co.uk/page/?title=History&pid=17

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Heehee
at least springwood didn't have a murderer come here. SPRING ONIONS FOR LIFE! KESBIANS ARE THE WORST! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.144.229.87 (talk) 18:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)