Talk:King for a Day... Fool for a Lifetime/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 09:46, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I'll pick this up. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

1

 * Lede
 * Should definitely have the nationality, genre too probably. Compare with FAs Kala (album) and Is This It
 * I went with "San Francisco-based" rather than "American", it seems more relevant to their leanings than something as broad as a country ("American" music is pretty wide spectrum depending on your home city/state, it seems). I took the genre out as a lot of FNM articles are the subject of an endless edit war over precise genres; I felt it best to just let the discussion of the actual music take precedence without listing a genre that will no doubt be changed thirty times back and forth by IP editors. :( GRAPPLE   X  14:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Production
 * Martin had already begun skipping practice sessions with the band," in 1993?
 * 1992ish; I've directly mentioned that it was during the recording of Angel Dust. GRAPPLE   X  14:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "during the Angel Dust recording session" - Huh, when? Link (if available)
 * Linked at first reference, didn't realise I hadn't done so. Reworded the date for it to draw more attention to the release year. GRAPPLE   X  14:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * whose wife Courtney Love was a close friend of Bottum's. - In the lede you have him as Cobain's friend
 * Have amended the lead to match this. GRAPPLE   X  14:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

2

 * Reference for German charting?
 * Must have overlooked that; the German chart site doesn't actually list it as having charted at all. :/ Removed. GRAPPLE   X  14:13, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

3

 * No information where the album was recorded and the like?
 * All in all the production section is a little light.
 * Have expanded it with an extra parapgraph worth of stuff and broken it into two subheadings; if it still feels a bit brief I can see what else I could dig up. GRAPPLE   X  17:14, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Further discussion

 * On hold for seven days — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for having a look at this one for me. I appreciate it. GRAPPLE   X  17:15, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Almost there, just one fact tag to deal with (direct quote, so needs a citation) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Cited that, was just the same source as the one used for the paragraph. GRAPPLE   X  10:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright, looks good to go! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:48, 6 July 2012 (UTC)