Talk:King of Kings (Don Omar album)

Fair use rationale for Image:King of kings.jpg
Image:King of kings.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King of Kings (Don Omar album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120321232252/http://mexicancharts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Don+Omar to http://mexicancharts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Don+Omar

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Sale of the album:King of Kings
The album sold general sales of 4.1 million copies According to Business Wire. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20130503005422/en/Latin-Pop-Icon-Don-Omar-Interacts-with-Fans-through-Mobli-and-SnapTagz%C2%AE

And sold 6 million copies According to the sources La Musica, Historia-Biografia. https://lamegafm.lamusica.com/noticias-y-farandula/10-cosas-quiza-recordabas-king-of-kings-don-omar#:~:text=A%20nivel%20mundial%2C%20King%20of,el%20m%C3%BAsico%20no%20pod%C3%ADa%20usar.

https://historia-biografia.com/don-omar/ Romberd (talk) 01:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The first source is already in the article. I'm not sure how reliable the second one is. Please comment on who publishes it and how reliable the source is. The third one says "Angelito, es el álbum que más unidades ha vendido del género con más de 6 millones". I don't speak the language, but I think it means "Angelito" sold more than 6 million copies. --Muhandes (talk) 09:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The information is of the page "La Musica", is one page of music and radio, the information is realiable and verifiable about the sale of the album of 6 million copies Worldwide.

https://www.lamusica.com/ the page "La Musica".

https://lamegafm.lamusica.com/noticias-y-farandula/10-cosas-quiza-recordabas-king-of-kings-don-omar#:~:text=A%20nivel%20mundial%2C%20King%20of,el%20m%C3%BAsico%20no%20pod%C3%ADa%20usar. information of the sale of 6 million copies Worldwide of the page.

Romberd (talk) 22:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * You have not answered my question. You keep using the information is realiable and verifiable, which you also use about TheRichest, against consensus. Explain why you think it is reliable and how is it verifiable. Who publishes it? What sort of editorial scrutiny and fact checking do they have? Again (for the fifth(?) time), please read HELP:TALK. --Muhandes (talk) 00:41, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The information is of one website and page of related with the music, too the information is in others pages, is one information reliable. The editorial scrutiny is Spanish Broadcasting Syntem Inc.

https://www.lamusica.com/about — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romberd (talk • contribs) 00:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I see now that they are an app by Spanish Broadcasting System. I know little about it, but I'm going to assume they are credible. I added the fact to the page. --Muhandes (talk) 08:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * "Thanks you to understand".

Romberd (talk) 22:40, 28 January 2022 (UTC)