Talk:King of Rock and Roll

Name changed
I changed a couple instances of "Elvis" to "Presley" in the belief that this conforms with encyclopedic style. This might be a special case though, since Elvis was well-known under simply his first name. I checked the Elvis Presley article to see if there's any preference there, but there is no consistent convention. (It uses "Presley", "Elvis", and "Elvis Presley" interchangeably.) Is there an agreed-upon convention for Elvis's name in Wikipedia? Honestly, I didn't want to shift through the entire Presley discussion haystack to find that needle, so I decided to go with his last name simply to make it consistent with references to Chuck Berry as "Berry" in this article.--Mbennardo 17:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The EP article now consistently features "Presley".Rikstar 12:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

What the????
This article is absolutely atrocious, vastly POV, beyond anything anyone can expect Wikipedia to handle, and should've been automatically deleted on the day that it was created.UberCryxic 03:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

?????????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.67.50.29 (talk) 06:32, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

If deleted, please Redirect
If you delete this article (which I heartily endorse), please replace it with a Redirect to Honorific titles in popular music. The rationale is discussed in my comments on the deletion discussion for that page. Thanks. --Eliyahu S Talk 13:40, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Redirect targets
I am not happy with the discussion at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 17. I welcome editors to form a consensus here instead. Neel.arunabh (talk) 00:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * What do you feel might be changed about this redirect in particular? -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, see what google search results give on the first page

      Neel.arunabh (talk) 16:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC)