Talk:Kingdom Hearts HD 1.5 Remix/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 05:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

I'll have the review ready in a few day's time. --ProtoDrake (talk) 05:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Review
Initial Comments Those are my initial thoughts on the review. I'll be back with more detailed stuff once the items above are addressed or explained. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The lead doesn't need exact release dates. Reccomend rephrasing it to "First revealed in 2012, it released in Japan in March 2013 and in the West in September the same year".
 * The lead lacks any kind of information regarding its development, and its emphasis on the later collections seems too high.
 * ✅. Let me know what you think of the new lead.
 * Recommend renaming "Games" to "Content".
 * I feel like "Games" is a better header than "Content".
 * This isn't essential. It can be left as is.
 * Development section needlessly repeats information from the Release section. Either properly distribute the information, or merge the two into a "Development and Release" section. The latter might be preferable, given the low use of development information in the section.
 * I've reduced the repetition in the development of the release date. I think both should be two separate headings still.
 * GameRankings shouldn't be used here. It's a seventh-gen games, and I believe there was an agreement not to use GR for anything later than sixth gen.
 * Main reception paragraph should be broken into two paragraphs.
 * I would rename "Additional Collections" to "Later Collections".
 * Not overly opposed to this, but might have to think on it a bit because I'm not feeling that's the best change at this time.
 * I'm alright with leaving it as is if you think it's better that way.
 * I would rename "Additional Collections" to "Later Collections".
 * Not overly opposed to this, but might have to think on it a bit because I'm not feeling that's the best change at this time.
 * I'm alright with leaving it as is if you think it's better that way.
 * I've added responses above to your comments. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I've had another look through, and I'd be willing to give this a Pass, now the main issues have been addressed. --ProtoDrake (talk) 18:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks ! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)