Talk:Kingdom Hearts HD 2.8 Final Chapter Prologue

it is listed with a new years eve release on official sites
that means 2017 at the earliest. that is why i changed the release date.84.212.73.96 (talk) 13:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Article Rating
I believe it is a C rated article; if you look at the criteria, Start articles mainly have spelling and grammar issues along with structural problems and a lack of reliable sources. This article has none of those issues; in fact, the issues it has include content gaps and a need for copyediting, which describes a C article rating exactly. The article is therefore a C class, not a Start. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 01:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Well if there are no objections, I'd like to re-up the article to C status. Rest assured, further work will be done and it will be made a B and a GA at some point anyway. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * It still isn't a C yet. Definitely in the start range. If a bit more content gets added, then it will bump up to a C. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Reference 10 & 11 Are Exactly the Same, Right?
The correction was reverted, why? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the fix, appreciated! :) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 15:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

1st Production Department doesn't exist any more, it's BD3
Square Enix restructured their development structure in December 2013 to the Bussiness Division structure: http://www.famitsu.com/ad/welcome/160426_uncharted/?referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.famitsu.com%2Fnews%2F201312%2F28045984.html

KH series games are by BD3: http://www.jp.square-enix.com/recruit/career/group/3bd/ Just check the job listings, a lot of them are for KH, in particular KH3.Brayden96 (talk) 17:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Is it a remastered collection if it collects one game?
The lead currently calls this an HD remastered collection of the Kingdom Hearts series. It could be I’m not clear on the meaning of that phrase, but if it contains one remastered game and a brand-new game, I would say that label is wrong and misleading. Am I missing something? —67.14.236.50 (talk) 03:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Formatting of "Kingdom Hearts 0.2" title
This is something that's been on my mind for a while, but the use of the colon and dash doesn't to line up with other colon-less Kingdom Hearts titles as they're formatted here, especially the title of this very article. Of course, considering how no one objected to the title for roughly a year before I spoke up, this discussion may very well be superfluous. But for the sake of general consistency, I feel now is as good a time as any. Given how A Fragmentary Passage is given the stylized subtitle treatment, plus taking the formatting of the title in the game's opening sequence into account (that being a break between Kingdom Hearts and 0.2 Birth by Sleep), I believe it'd be appropriate to move the colon after Birth by Sleep and remove the dash altogether, making it Kingdom Hearts 0.2 Birth by Sleep: A Fragmentary Passage. User:SubZeroSilver (talk) 01:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The reasoning was due to how the title was formatted in third party sources (and potentially press releases by Square Enix). Most had the title with the two subtitles: 0.2 as the first, Fragmentary second. As the collection is being released, more sources will undoubtedly make note of the title, which may help in determining if the way it is is correct, or what you have suggested. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:07, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

organization
my edit was made to match HD 1.5 remix articleBlue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 19:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

GA Nomination
I want to nominate this article for Good Article status. Are there any objections? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 15:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I object, because you are not a significant contributor to the article. For the GA process, you had to have made many alterations to the article so that it meets the critera before you nominate it. Archiving sources via a bot is not significant. It's basically just taking credit for other's work. Even if I didn't remove the GAN template on this page, it likely would have failed the review anyway because of poor writing, an article style that doesn't follow WPVG/MOS, the lack of a screenshot, and a review section that is barren in terms of content. This article is a long way from becoming a GA, so I'd really put a lot of work into this before you decide to nominate this again. Thanks. Namcokid  47  (Contribs) 16:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, anyone can nominate an article to GA if they believe it meets the criteria. Anyone may nominate an article to be reviewed for GA, although it is preferable that nominators have contributed significantly to the article and are familiar with its subject and its cited sources. It's not a strict requirement. As for the article, it's probably close with a little more spitshine and beefing up some sections. Axem Titanium (talk) 05:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination. Namcokid  47  (Contribs) 21:55, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

GA nomination?
Ok, I added a bunch of content to the games section, greatly expanded the reception section, added a screenshot of something that was praised by reviewers, and rewrote the whole article. So I think, at some point, we should nominate this article for Good Article candidacy. If anyone sees something they want changed or added, let me know. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 00:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)