Talk:Kingdom hearts 3

Deleting this article
Why? If expected video game sequels are given articles, and book sequels too (there was quite a lengthy article on Harry Potter 7 before it came out), then why can't Kingdom Hearts 3 have one? Use the force (Talk * Contribs) 13:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Probably because the game won't be Kingdom Hearts III, for starters. And the fact that we have no actual confirmation of another game (see vaporware). I don't care what the Harry Potter people do; we're not going to have a shitty article filled with no actual information whatsoever. ' 20:23, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Remember even basic stuff like it's the sequel to the other KH games, made by a combo of Square and Disney, unresolved plot elements from KH II, etc. is "actual information whatsoever." And remember WP:CIVIL. Use the force (Talk * Contribs) 12:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Remember basic stuff like actual confirmation of production is necessary to make an article. (Especially considering the repeated mentions by Nomura himself that the next installment is not Kingdom Hearts III.) "Unresolved plot elements"? Who determines that? You? Me? And remember WP:CIVIL doesn't really apply to calling a hypothetical article "shitty".


 * We already have the "future installments" section in Kingdom Hearts (series). More is pointlessly excessive and ugly. ' 23:48, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. However, if Nomura ever names and confirms the next installment, then I see no reason to stop the article (under a more correct title, of course). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Use the force (talk • contribs) 14:32, August 30, 2007 (UTC)