Talk:Kingdom of Lithuania (1918)

Appendix titles
Despite the fact that it is not a strict requirement (see WP:FNNR), I'd suggest we follow the following convention: "Notes" for the explanatory material and "Citations" for the citations. A good practice in Wikipedia is that sections should not bear confusingly similar titles: my rationale is that 'footnotes' and 'notes' are confusingly similar to each other. I would like to stress that my proposal is not about exercising any kind of misplaced consistency. It's a proposal towards less confusing conventions in a specific series of articles. --Omnipaedista (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kingdom of Lithuania (1918). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080303191252/http://mkp.emokykla.lt/gimtoji/ to http://mkp.emokykla.lt/gimtoji/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:48, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

About the flag
Pinging all involved users: User:Sabbatino, User:Лобачев Владимир, User:Samhanin. The flag that Samhanin adds is perfectly justified - in the article, there is the photo of the Vilnius Conference in 1917, where the flag is used. The Wiki article also has the same photo but larger that also includes the flag, which Samhanin made into a rather good-looking SVG file. As for the colours, they are the ones that have always been used. I suggest we keep the flag.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 14:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)