Talk:KingsRoad

Untitled

 * This article has a lot of marketing phrases, such as "allows players to get the fun of a real-time RPG", and extolling the virtules of the management team. It was clearly written by an insider right at the time of launch and hasn't really been edited since, so I flagged it as an advertisement. dtype 15:29, 12 December 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dtype (talk • contribs)
 * Totally agree. It's pretty obvious. It reads like a press release. 20:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mvblair (talk • contribs)
 * I made enough changes that I think we can remove the advertisement flag. Feel free to stick it back on if you think it's still needed. Mvblair (talk) 20:45, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Reception
Pivotal Gamers awarded it a score of 8.2 out of 10 based on its overall performance across the WEB, categorizing it as a great game to play.

Pivotal Gamers (talk) 14:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Pivotal Gamers, and thank you for your suggestion. I am declining this edit request for a similar reason to your other request on World of Warships. The review your website provides just calls this game "great" and gives it a score of 8.2. Ideally, reviews listed in the reception section should provide some justification behind the rating scale, because a game that is ranked as an 8.2 on Pivotal Gamers might be a 55 on Metacritic, or 7.0/10.0 on IGN, so an explanation of methodology of the rating scale is in order. Altamel (talk) 03:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello Altamel, our short game review is located at http://www.pivotalgamers.com/kingsroad/kingsroad-review/ so we are not just calling the game "great". Thus If you believe that this review justifies a link back to Pivotal Gamers please use the review page URL rather than the main page URL as a reference.Pivotal Gamers (talk) 16:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KingsRoad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140319000447/http://www.zam.com/story.html?story=31696&storypage=1 to http://www.zam.com/story.html?story=31696&storypage=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)