Talk:Kinzua Bridge/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Kinzua Bridge/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Unlinked. ​​ ​​D ​​tbohrer​​​ ​talk • contribs 05:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Unlinked. ​​ ​​D ​​tbohrer​​​ ​talk • contribs 05:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I cited the actual TV show. If thats not OK, I have a backup. ​​ ​​D ​​tbohrer​​​ ​talk • contribs 18:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I cited the actual TV show. If thats not OK, I have a backup. ​​ ​​D ​​tbohrer​​​ ​talk • contribs 18:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The "overlook" and the "observation deck" are not the same thing. Put in status as "nothing has been decided on yet." ​​ ​​D ​​tbohrer​​​ ​talk • contribs 05:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The "overlook" and the "observation deck" are not the same thing. Put in status as "nothing has been decided on yet." ​​ ​​D ​​tbohrer​​​ ​talk • contribs 05:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * I rewrote a really odd-sounding paragraph; everything else looks good. &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 14:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)