Talk:Kissingen Springs

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... (I am working opn it now) --Drakeman9 (talk) 14:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

moved...
Per WP:NAME. Victorian Mutant (Talk) 22:06, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Needs a lot of work
The article is currently in a sorry state. While the springs and their restoration are/is clearly notable, the article currently doesn't even say where the springs are/were! And it's heavily weighted torwards restoration, reasoning why the springs dried up, and seems somewhat WP:SYNTH-y. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)