Talk:Kitchen Confidential

I'm not so sure that the book and the TV show need to be on the same page...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.194.28.132 (talk) 13:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Jeez Louise, please separate the book and the TV show
Should never in a million years be in the same article or even spoken of in the same breath. Softlavender (talk) 04:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Done: Created a separate article: Kitchen Confidential (television series). Softlavender (talk) 04:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Linking
There are a lot of links that point to the book that should point to the TV series. I don't have the necessary tools to enable me to do this quickly, but I'm hoping someone can disambiguate the pages. 24.41.47.147 (talk) 20:20, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved. Number   5  7  16:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Kitchen Confidential: Adventures in the Culinary Underbelly → Kitchen Confidential (book) – I normally dislike proposing "(book)" because almost no one types it for any title. I disambiguated the book because Kitchen Confidential (TV series) is equally popular as the book. I did use "(book)", but I figured that I can use subtitles instead of parenthesis disambiguator. However, due to Talk:Like a Virgin (book), probably "(book)" should substitute for the subtitle "Adventures in the Culinary Underbelly" due to the length of the current article title. I thought nominating the article for deletion or tagging it as possibly non-notable. However, the book inspired the fictional TV series, and it may have existing reviews. Despite the article's current shape, the book may be notable at its own right. Therefore, I am doing the test proposal to inspire other proposals on books with long titles. George Ho (talk) 02:39, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Support The book is likely independently notable, and the proposed name seems to be far more common, judging by both Bourdain's use of the title and coverage of Bourdain that refers to the book.--Yaksar (let's chat) 03:40, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.