Talk:Kitsap Fast Ferries/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Adityavagarwal (talk · contribs) 04:22, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Glad to pick it up for a review!


 * Catamaran is a duplink, so that has to be removed.
 * It's rather far from the first link and in an entirely new section about the vessels. I think it's worth keeping.
 * "in the U.S. state of Washington" Do we need to mention "in the U.S. state of"?
 * Yes, since Washington is often confused with the national capital of Washington, D.C.
 * "and early 20th" perhaps add a "the" in the middle?
 * The "the" before "late 19th century" carries over.
 * Link Seattle, Bremerton, Southworth, and Vashon in body.
 * Done.
 * Do we know whom the 400 passengerfeery was leased?
 * The company isn't notable, so I added a generic description.
 * Link Kingston in body.
 * Done.
 * Also explain foil-assisted in brackets.
 * It is explained in the next sentence.
 * There should be a hyphen in "low wake" in the Vessels section? The lead has it.
 * Only in the second instance.
 * Link King County.
 * Already linked (as King County Dept. of Transportation).


 * Ready for a check.  Sounder Bruce  05:05, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * SounderBruce}} Looks yet another interesting article. Goodto go! [[User:Adityavagarwal|Adityavagarwal (talk) 10:41, 31 October 2017 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail: