Talk:Klaus Schnellenkamp

Lacking sources
The last two paragraphs lack any sources. Especially the claim that he faced assassination attempts should be sourced in my eyes. Supsudelu (talk) 02:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Source reference added MarioGullivert (talk) 06:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

I suggest deleting the article as the protagonist has not had any public relevance for over 10 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PetermMY (talk • contribs) 13:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Peter for writing me. Of course, there is no reason to claim Wikipedia with this article, as according to the Wikipedia statutes there is no public relevance that would justify this article. I therefore request deletion. Cheers DM — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Maasden (talk • contribs) 15:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

I request that the article be deleted immediately, as it does not in any way fulfill the minimum requirements for an entry on Wikipedia:

Wikipedia only allows articles about people who are reported on permanently, i.e. not just for a short interval, by as many independent, reputable, public service media as possible. The last time Klaus Schnellenkamp was reported on was over 10 years ago. And at that time only for a very short period of time. For this reason, the basis for the existence of this article has long since been removed. In accordance with the Wikimedia guidelines, the article should therefore be deleted immediately! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PadreSanLuis (talk • contribs) 14:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)