Talk:Klaus and Greta/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC) Cool! Just one thing: the url in ref #15 is incorrect. Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I fixed the link it seems the page was removed but I found a Google cache of it. Would that work?  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  09:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you Alucard, I appreciate you fixing the link. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  15:21, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem ThinkBlue, glad to help. Nice to take a break from Big Brother articles once in a while.  ♪♫Al  ucard   16♫♪  01:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Good :) Tis a pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Klaus and Greta passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: