Talk:Klavika

Notability issues
In comparison to the size of the article, there are enough secondary sources (four out of five can be considered secondary). Also, the font is famous enough both for typography practitioners and enthusiasts as well as the public audience (due use on Facebook and NBC). So I find the notability concern irrelevant in this case. --Shervinafshar (talk) 18:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Klavika. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111105053211/http://www.spt.co.uk/subwaymod/index.aspx to http://www.spt.co.uk/subwaymod/index.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140929150026/http://tecnico.ulisboa.pt/files/media/media-kit/Kit-Normas-IST.pdf to http://tecnico.ulisboa.pt/files/media/media-kit/Kit-Normas-IST.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)