Talk:Kneser graph

Special page for Kneser bipartite graph?
Hello,

For your information, on the French wikipedia, we created a special page for the Kneser bipartite graph under the name fr:Graphe biparti de Kneser. The reasoning behind that is that the Kneser bipartite graph is not a Kneser Graph, they only share a part of their name. --MathsPoetry (talk) 08:29, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kneser graph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120323231232/http://www.math.caltech.edu/~2011-12/2term/ma192b/kneser-evals.pdf to http://www.math.caltech.edu/~2011-12/2term/ma192b/kneser-evals.pdf
 * Added tag to http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-03142004-013420/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Kneser graphs are Hamiltonian
All Kneser graphs (except for the Petersen graph) were shown to be Hamiltonian. I added this statement and a source. I did not remove the mention of the previous partial results, thought I think they are less relevant now. If there is no objection I will consider to delete them in the future.

There are some special cases that have shorter more elegant proofs that are noteworthy because of that. So if for a special case we can emphasizes this aspect, this might be a reason to keep it. MWinter4 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)