Talk:Knight of Shadows

Justify or Amend
Admirably brief current synopsis ends poorly: "The 'genealogical gaffes' here refers to a number of inconsistencies in the first series (the Corwin Cycle) regarding the parentage of Corwin's various siblings." Who says so? On the face of it, it may merely refer to the inconvenient offspring of various illegitimate unions in that story. If it is a meta-gag about continuity errors in the earlier books, what are they and what citable authority has demonstrated that they exist? Even if the remark could be justified, it seems to take a disproportionate share of a very short synopsis.

Mandrakos (talk) 01:31, 20 March 2017 (UTC)