Talk:Knightmare (1987 video game)

Untitled
I've got the game but I've not played it much so someone else needs to fill in the story more. I have the manual, box and disks for the Amiga version so if anyone thinks there should be more information from any of those I can get it when it's suggested. Bill 19:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Confusing
This article is pretty confusing. It's about two different computer games but with the same title. Can't this be split into TWO articles instead? (one for each game) // Kada 1 january 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.177.80.218 (talk) 07:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Amiga Knightmare.jpg
Image:Amiga Knightmare.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Split out
I have now spun out The 1991 Knightmare to Knightmare (1991 video game). To be compliant with WP:Spinout and the GFDL, the edit history of this article must remain, but I don't see this as a problem as this page is unlikely be deleted. Bill (talk 13:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)