Talk:Knights of the Zodiac (film)

The movie didn't cost 60 millions dollars
One of the producers, Miguel Angel Faura, and the director, Tomek Baginski, have already confirmed that the movie did not cost 60 million, but it was less.

Furthermore, the mention of the 60 million was never made by the producer Ikezawa in the Variety interview; it was written by the reporter. Moreover, nowhere does it state that the 60 million is for a single movie; it implies that it is for more than one. "And putting together the $60 million first leg in a major movie franchise," where "first leg" could refer to more than one movie, not necessarily just one. If it were a single movie, they would have said "film/movie," not "leg."

Sources: Interview with producer Miguel Angel Faura (min 26:50) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDZcdB9iark (you can activate the automatic subs, they work fine) Interview with director Tomek Baginski https://www.ssnextdimension.com/saintseiyaeliniciopresupuesto/

If they continue to insist on editing and spreading lies, I will be forced to tag a moderator. 201.182.80.18 (talk) 00:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi IP, I am declining your third opinion again. As Firefangledfeathers explained to you on your talk page, there hasn't been enough discussion to warrant a third opinion being provided. Pinging Some discussion between you and the IP would be a good idea before reverting again. JML1148 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 00:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If the film's budget is unknown, then we do not put down "unknown" in the Infobox. That hardly makes any sense at all. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 07:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)