Talk:Knightscope

Untitled
This article is terribly written. Many of the statements contradict themselves, the grammar is sub-par, and a large number of citations are broken. I'm tempted to go in here and rip the majority of this stuff out so we can start over with a clean-ish slate. My favorites, btw, are the bits about collecting 90 TB of data per day using infrared light, and "detect[ing] objects 24 hours long."

"Optical character recognition" refers to the recognition of letters 107.146.196.173 (talk) 08:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

-Would it be off-color to replace all instances of "People" with "It has been speculated" or "One might speculate" I especially think speculation has no place in an encyclopedia, but it's better than referring to the same source a certain politician uses to make baseless statements. Jeffman12 (talk) 00:19, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Broken Reference
One of the references ( ""Knightscope technology"". Knightscope, Inc. Retrieved 29 October 2014.) currently leads to a page not found error. I don't know what the protocol for this is, I just thought someone who does should know Deadlyops (talk) 20:42, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Knightscope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141021233921/http://knightscope.com/technology/ to http://knightscope.com/technology/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141127010627/http://www.hca.uws.edu.au/101013/assignments/greg_hughes/chi_thien_tran/assignment7/Kevin_Tran_Milestone7.docx to http://www.hca.uws.edu.au/101013/assignments/greg_hughes/chi_thien_tran/assignment7/Kevin_Tran_Milestone7.docx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

advertisement
Is it really fair to call this an advertisement? Theres a large section on criticism and the rest of the article is really just general info that isnt really that promotional in nature. Wikiman5676 (talk) 18:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * As there is no response, and i have made some changes to the page including adding some encyclopedic content. I have removed the tag. Wikiman5676 (talk) 00:25, 1 January 2022 (UTC)