Talk:Koh-i-Sultan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tisquesusa (talk · contribs) 05:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Very complete article about a volcano little known, good job
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Well-written, correct grammar, lead is ok, but could be expanded a bit, lay-out good
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Extensive list of reliable references, wording is not copyvio'd, neat
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Complete overview of the various characteristics of this volcano. Enough detail about the rock types, ages and location
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No bias in this relatively sensitive region between Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No problems
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * More images could be added, but there are none freely available of this mountain at Commons, so ok
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Compliments for creating an extensive well-written article about a relatively unknown and for Pakistan unusual volcano. Great article.
 * Hum. seems like the passing has not been registered. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)